USPTO serial 75814262
EXPERT ARCHIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXPERT ARCHIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Huntington Woods, MI
Huntington Woods, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Stewart
MICHAEL B STEWART RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVEBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF WITNESS TESTIMONY AND RELATED EXPERT INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |