Drawing for DINNER FOR TWO

USPTO serial 75814298

DINNER FOR TWO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINNER FOR TWO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl F. Milde, Jr.

KARL F MILDE JR MILDE, HOFFBERG & MACKLIN, LLP10 BANK ST STE 460WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FRESH, PREPARED AND PARTIALLY PREPARED MEAT, FISH, GAME, AND POULTRY, BOTH IN FROZEN AND NON-FROZEN FORM, SMOKED AND NON-SMOKED FORM, IN THE FORM OF PATTIES, AND AS EXTRACTS; SAUSAGE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CANNED SAUSAGES; PREPARED AND READY TO EAT MEAT AND FISH ITEMS, NAMELY, SAUSAGES IN GERMAN LANDJAEGER-STYLE, HAMBURGER, FISHBURGER; PICKLED FISH; CANNED MEAT, FISH, GAME, POULTRY, VEGETABLE, FRUIT AND SOUP, ALSO IN FROZEN PRESERVED FORM; MEAT, FISH, PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN GELATIN FORM; CANNED AND DRIED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; MIXED PICKLES; SAUSAGES; SALADS EXCEPT MACARONI, RICE AND PASTA SALAD, NAMELY, MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND VEGETABLE SALADS; CANNED RAGOUTS; PREPARED FOODS, NAMELY, SOUPS, VEGGY-BURGER MEAT, CHEESEBURGER MEAT; PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING OF MEAT, VEGETABLE OR POTATOES; SOUPS AND BROTH; BREAD SPREADS, NAMELY, MEAT-BASED SPREADS, EGG-BASED SPREADS AND CHEESE SPREADSACTIVE—
030DUMPLINGS; CHEESEBURGER SANDWICHES; HAMBURGER SANDWICHES; FISHBURGER SANDWICHES; VEGGIE-BURGER SANDWICHES; PROCESSED GRAINS, NAMELY, PROCESSED CEREALS OF ALL KINDS; MEAT PIES OF GAME AND POULTRY; PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICE; PREPARED PASTA FOODS, NAMELY, FROZEN PASTA WITH SAUCES OR KETCHUP OR OTHER INGREDIENTS; PIZZAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance