Drawing for CARPET WIZARD

USPTO serial 75814403

CARPET WIZARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARPET WIZARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Mitchell,

JAMES A MITCHELL PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR, S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007CARPET CLEANING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SHAMPOOER, SPOT REMOVER AND VACUUM CLEANERACTIVEApr 26, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 14, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 30, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 30, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 24, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance