USPTO serial 75814454
PONYMILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PONYMILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN C KUNZLER
BRIAN C KUNZLER MADSON & METCALFGATEWAY TWR W15 W S TEMPLE STE 900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for cutting, shearing, de-scaling and finishing metals, steel and steel strip, machines for charging metal and metal slabs to furnaces; metal working machine; mills; mills for steel, mills for steel strip, rolling mills, finishing mills; coiling machines; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Treatment of metal; treatment of steel; material treatment information; metals treatment and information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of foundry, casting, metal working, moulding, lifting, hoisting, metals , metals handling apparatus and equipment, conveyors moulds, rolling mills, molten metal conveying, pouring and storage apparatus and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |