USPTO serial 75814539
SHOPTHEDOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOPTHEDOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY A. DONOVAN
MARY A DONOVAN DONOVAN & YEE LLP110 GREENE ST STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive customer service computer kiosks for music, video and laser disc preview and selection; computer terminals for use in sampling stations and dispensing pre-selected and personalized selections of music, video and other digital content, musical sound recordings provided by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of music via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital On-Demand, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital On-Demand, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named SHOPTHEDOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |