USPTO serial 75814583
PRE-BORN CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRE-BORN CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Neil Sudol
R NEIL SUDOL708 THIRD AVE FOURTEENTH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-4101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES PROVIDING INSTRUCTION, EDUCATION AND TEACHING ON HEALTH CARE AND MEDICAL PLANNING; MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM AND PROVIDING INSTRUCTION, EDUCATION AND TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE AND MEDICAL PLANNING; ELECTRONIC INSTRUCTION, EDUCATION AND TEACHING MATERIALS ON HEALTH CARE AND MEDICAL PLANNING, TO BE TRANSMITTED OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED Instructional, EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS, IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE AND MEDICAL PLANNING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |