USPTO serial 75814672
THINK COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2989865Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THINK COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory P. Kaihoi
JOHN P COLBERT GRAYDON HEAD & RICHEY LLP511 WALNUT ST1900 FIFTH 3RD CTRCINCINNATI, OH 45202-3157Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in delivering video, audio and text editorial in the field of college counseling; computer software for use in producing interactive decision lists, personal transcripts, search criteria and spreadsheets in the field of college counseling; computer software for use in reviewing college databases, entrance exam programs, financial aid offerings and college offers, and allowing users to communicate with counselors in the field of college counseling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |