Drawing for EGGROLL

USPTO serial 75814816

EGGROLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3350609Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EGGROLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter C. Cooke

D. Peter Hochberg D. Peter Hochberg Co., L.P.A.1940 East 6th Street - 6th FloorCleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Dice Games and Board GamesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 2, 2007DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Nov 2, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Oct 29, 2007D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Sep 26, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 26, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 3, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance