USPTO serial 75814831
XITEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XITEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Milton Keynes MK8 0ES, GB
Milton Keynes MK8 0ES, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER OFFLOAD AND MIGRATION SOFTWARE FOR USE IN TRANSITIONING MAINFRAME APPLICATIONS TO ALTERNATIVE COMPUTER ENVIRONMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER MIGRATION SOLUTIONS, NAMELY, ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS FOR APPLICATION TRANSITIONING; ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY OF APPLICATION TRANSITIONING; ASSESSMENT OF THE SCOPE OF THE APPLICATIONS TO BE TRANSITIONED; TRANSITION COSTING; TRANSITION RISK ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL; AND BUSINESS CASE PREPARATION FOR APPLICATION TRANSITIONING | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER MIGRATION SOLUTIONS, NAMELY, TRAINING IN THE USE AND DEPLOYMENT OF TRANSITIONING SOFTWARE AND METHODS, DELIVERED BOTH IN SEMINAR-STYLE TRAINING COURSES AND VIA INDIVIDUAL COACHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER MIGRATION SOLUTIONS, NAMELY, PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE INSTALLATION AND DEPLOYMENT; DESIGN, SIZING AND SYSTEM CONTROL OF THE TRANSITIONED SYSTEM; SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONFIGURATION WITHIN THE TRANSITIONED SYSTEM; METADATA TRANSITION, APPLICATION CODE TRANSITION, AND APPLICATION DATA TRANSITION, ALL BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND TARGET SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION OF THE TRANSITIONED APPLICATION WITH THE OPERATING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT OF THE TARGET COMPUTER; APPLICATION TESTING TO ENSURE FUNCTIONAL CORRESPONDENCE OF THE ORIGINAL AND TRANSITIONED SYSTEMS; APPLICATION TESTING AND TUNING TO ENSURE THAT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE TRANSITIONED SYSTEM IS ACCEPTABLE; TRANSITIONED SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION; TRANSITIONED SYSTEM HAND-OVER; COMPUTER AND APPLICATION SYSTEM ERROR DIAGNOSIS; INCIDENT REPORTING; MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION OF SOFTWARE DEFECTS; PROVISION OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION; AND POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XITEC SOFTWARE PLC
- Other trademarks owned by XITEC SOFTWARE PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XITEC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |