USPTO serial 75814939
BEST OFFER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST OFFER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLA B OAKLEY
CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR1 MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing a website through which users may place orders for the purchase of motor vehicles; and promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of advertising materials via a global communications network; providing information in the field of motor vehicle sales and taxation, providing and on-line computer database featuring information about motor vehicle purchases and taxation | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 1999 |
| 036 | financial and insurance services, namely, providing and arranging for motor vehicle purchases; providing extended warranties in the field of motor vehicle; providing information in the field of motor vehicle purchase financing and insurance; providing an on-line computer database in the field of motor vehicle insurance | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 1999 |
| 042 | providing information in the field of motor vehicles and motor vehicle inspections and registration; providing an on-line computer database in the field of motor vehicles and motor vehicle inspection and registration | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |