USPTO serial 75814949
EPHYSICIANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPHYSICIANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO HEALTH, FITNESS AND MEDICAL NEWS AND INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO HEALTH AND MEDICAL COUNSELING AND ADVICE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO NEWS AND INFORMATION ON WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HEALTH VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO DRUG AND PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON SPORTS-REATED INJURIES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO MEDICAL DICTIONARY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON ALLERGENS IN CERTAIN GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS ON THE UNITED STATES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |