Drawing for .COM BY WHEREHOUSE

USPTO serial 75814953

.COM BY WHEREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with .COM BY WHEREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marnie Wright Barnhorst

MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST THE TRADEMARK GROUP501 W BROADWAY STE 770SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035on-line and in-store retail services featuring audio and video recordings, books, posters, greeting cards, magazines, audio and video compact disk players, speakers, headphones, computer mice, CD carriers, cases and storage units, boxed games and computer software; club membership services, namely providing access to promotions, contests and discounts on merchandiseACTIVE—
038electronic mail services, namely, providing access to a database that facilitates the creation and transmission of electronic mail messages with an audio component; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning in the field of entertainmentACTIVE—
041on-line and in-store rental services featuring audio and video recordings, books, posters, greeting cards, magazines, audio and video compact disk players, speakers, headphones, computer mice, CD carriers, cases, and storage units and boxed games; providing information in the field of music, movies, actors and musicians via an interactive website on the global computer network; entertainment services in the nature of on-line music services, namely, providing music over the global computer networkACTIVE—
042Rental services featuring computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 18, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 11, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance