USPTO serial 75815452
BOY TOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2003
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOY TOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
Denver, CO
Other trademarks owned by The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
Denver, CO
Other trademarks owned by The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
Denver, CO
Other trademarks owned by The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | JOCK STRAPS, NAMELY ATHLETIC SUPPORTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 27, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Jim Feiccabrino, Mark Pfeifer, Scott Jeffries, Larry Wyzgala, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BOY TOY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |