USPTO serial 75815471
NETPLAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETPLAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM A. MUNCK
WILLIAM A MUNCK NOVAKOV, DAVIS & MUNCK, PCPO DRAWER 800889DALLAS, TX 75380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for downloading videos from the global computer network and viewed on a television | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VESTA BROADBAND SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VideosDotCom Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VideosDotCom Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NETPLAYER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |