USPTO serial 75816016
COMPLICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2679387Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPLICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
93100 MONTREUIL SOUS BOIS, FR
93100 MONTREUIL SOUS BOIS, FR
93100 MONTREUIL SOUS BOIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL W. KRUSE
PAUL W KRUSE PILLSBURYWINTHROP LLPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SUN SCREENING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SUN SCREENING PREPARATIONS SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS AND SUN-TANNING PREPARATION; COSMETICS PREPARATIONS FOR THE BATH, NAMELY, BATH GEL, BATH OIL AND BATH POWDER; BATH SALTS (NOT FOR MEDICAL USE); HAIR LOTIONS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, COLD CREAM, EYE MAKE UP, BODY CREAM, EYE CREAM, HAND CREAM, NIGHT CREAM, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, SKIN CREAM AND VANISHING CREAM; DENTIFRICES; SOAPS, NAMELY, DEODORANT SOAPS, SKIN SOAPS, TOILET SOAPS AND LIQUID SOAPS FOR HANDS, FACE AND BODY; PERFUMERY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, COLOGNE, TOILET WATER AND PERFUME; EYE-SHADOW AND BLUSHES, LIPSTICKS; MAKE-UP PRODUCTS; * NAMELY, EYE SHADOW, BLUSHES, LIPSTICK AND FACE POWDERS; * NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NAIL BUFFING PREPARATIONS, NAIL ENAMELS, NAIL HARDENERS, NAIL POLISH, NAIL STRENGTHENERS AND NAIL VARNISHES; FACE POWDER; HAIR SHAMPOOS; SKIN AND HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN CLEANSING LOTION, SKIN EMOLLIENTS SKIN LIGHTENERS, SKIN LOTION, SKIN OIL MOISTURIZER, HAIR CLEANING PREPARATIONS, HAIR COLOUR REMOVERS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR DYE, HAIR GEL, HAIR LIGHTENERS, HAIR RINSES, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR STRAIGHTENING PREPARATION, HAIR STYLING PREPARATION AND HAIR WAVING LOTION; CLEANSING OIL AND MILKS; AND SHOE POLISH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |