Drawing for JETSEND

USPTO serial 75816038

JETSEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KREBS, CATHERINE K.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JETSEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerard P. Norton

Gerard P. Norton Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MARKETING RESPONSE AND FULFILLMENT SERVICES; NAMELY, PROCESSING AND RESPONDING TO REQUESTS FCR INFORMATION FOR THIRD PARTIES BY DISTRIBUTING MARKETING LITERATURE OR MERCHANDISE IN RESPONSE TO INDIVIDUAL REQUESTSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 4, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 5, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 5, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 15, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 5, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 4, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 30, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 6, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance