USPTO serial 75816978
AWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Travis
GARY M TRAVIS RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 29002 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Laser welding machines, and parts therefor; industrial robots; conveyors; automated material handling equipment, namely, material lifting machines, material conveyors, electric welding machines, gas-operated welding machines, stacking machines, and parts therefor; machine parts, namely, clamps for securing components during manufacturing processes; industrial manufacturing machines using welding stations for the production of tailored blanks for the automotive industry; industrial manufacturing machines using component lift robots for the production of tailored blanks for the automotive industry; and machine tools and parts therefor, all of the foregoing to be used in the production of tailored blanks for the automotive industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |