Drawing for NATURAL STRETCH

USPTO serial 75816985

NATURAL STRETCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KANG, JANE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL STRETCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White

ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FULL LINE OF CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDRENACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 20, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 3, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 3, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 1, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 17, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 26, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance