USPTO serial 75817371
MAILSECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAILSECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hampshire RG214EG, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR INFORMATION SECURITY APPLICATIONS, CRYPTOGRAPHY, PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY, PRIVATE KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY, ELECTRONIC SECURITY APPLICATIONS, ELECTRONIC SECURITY MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, TRANSACTION SECURITY, DOCUMENT SECURITY, SECURITY PROTOCOLS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES, DIGITAL CERTIFICATES, DIGITAL SIGNATURES, AND COMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR ADDING SECURITY TO EXISTING E-MAIL PACKAGES BY PROVIDING FULL-STRENGTH ENCRYPTION OF MESSAGES AND FILE ATTACHMENTS; ELECTRONIC SECURITY TOOLKITS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; ELECTRONIC SECURITY HARDWARE; COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR USE IN CRYPTOGRAPHY, ELECTRONIC SECURITY APPLICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC SECURITY MANAGEMENT, NAMELY FOR ADDING SECURITY TO EXISTING E-MAIL PACKAGES BY PROVIDING FULL-STRENGTH ENCRYPTION OF MESSAGES AND FILE ATTACHMENTS; AND USER/INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; CONSULTANCY AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN RELATION TO DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND UPDATING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SECURITY CONSULTATION; INFORMATION, SERVICE AND ASSISTANCE RELATING TO THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |