USPTO serial 75817377
KOLOR-BAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORA, ROGER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOLOR-BAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN FAIER
MARTIN FAIER FAIER & FAIER PC566 W ADAMS ST STE 600CHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair coloring preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |