Drawing for I-SIZE

USPTO serial 75818301

I-SIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-SIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF OFFERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE IMPLEMENTATION, INTEGRATION, CONDUCT AND MAINTENANCE OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ACTIVITIES AND NETWORKS FOR BUSINESS; COMPUTER SITE DESIGN, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN ALL FIELDS RELATED TO ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ACTIVITIES FOR BUSINESSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 31, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 15, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 8, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 12, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance