USPTO serial 75819285
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software to facilitate the purchasing of items in various retail or electronic commerce environments, computer e-commerce software and hardware to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via the global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |