Drawing for CO-MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 75819436

CO-MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CO-MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Ostfeld

DAVID M OSTFELD CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA, WHITE WILLIAMS &1200 SMITH ST STE 1400HOUSTON, TX 77002-4310UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035management consulting providing organization change consulting and team facilitationACTIVE—
041education consulting to provide breakthrough educationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 21, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 21, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 21, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 20, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 14, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 27, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 23, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance