USPTO serial 75820494
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, namely, cryptographic tokens and smart card readers; computer software for use in maintaining information security access control to computers, securing electronic communications, storing electronic signatures, and generating, distributing and recovering keys in network configuration | ACTIVE | Nov 2, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |