USPTO serial 75820574
CATCHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CATCHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL SERVICES AND MAIL ORDER SERVICES PROVIDED ONLINE OR FORM A COMPUTER DATABASE; COMPILATION AND DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING THROUGH AN ONLINE GLOBAL COMPUTER DATABASE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR A GLOBAL ONLINE COMPUTER NETWORK APPLICATION CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEBSITES; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER ONLINE INFORMATION DATABASE/NETWORK FOR A TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION AND DATA; HOSTING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; COMPILATION, ORGANIZATION AND SEARCH OF WEBSITES ON THE INTERNET; PROVIDING ON-LINE FACILITIES FOR REAL-TIME INTERACTION WITH OTHER COMPUTER USERS | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |