Drawing for QUES

USPTO serial 75820651

QUES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan E. Schiavelli

ALAN E SCHIAVELLI ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP1300 N SEVENTEENTH ST STE 1800ARLINGTON, VA 22209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Personal security alarms and anti-theft warning alarms; blank magnetic recording media; blank magnetic data media; blank optical data media; data processing apparatus, computers; computer memories; computer peripheral devices; microprocessors; computer monitors; computer programs, computer software for personal and perimeter security and for authentication of identification; computer operating programs; encoders; dactyloscopic detectors; automatic turnstiles; counterfeit false coin detectors; magnetic coded identity cards; magnetic coded cards; integrated circuit cards; blank smart cards; bar code readers; photometers; eyeglass lenses; prisms for scientific purposes; optical scanners; integrated circuits; printed circuits; electronic tags for goods; magnifying peepholes for doors; electronic door openers; electronic door closers; electronic monitors for security purposes; blank video tapes; video projection screens; video cameras; protective clothing and screens against X-rays for medical purposesACTIVE—
010Blood testing apparatus; electrodes for medical purposes; electrocardiographs; quartz lamps and ultraviolet ray lamps, for medical purposes; lasers for medical purposes; radiological apparatus for medical purposes; X-ray producing apparatus for medical purposes; X-rays tubes for medical purposes; radiology screens for medical purposes; cardiac probesACTIVE—
042consulting in the field of security and security technology; identification of persons and checking of admission; computer programming for others; computer software design for others, rental and maintenance of computer software; recovery of computer data; consultancy in the field of computer hardware and computer software; computer rental, surveying and engineering; technical consultation and research in the field of securityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 23, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance