Drawing for STARTECH BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER

USPTO serial 75820955

STARTECH BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STARTECH BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Recruiting individuals for the development of technology businesses; business management consultation, namely consultation for the development of technology businessesACTIVEOct 1, 1997
036Venture capital investment management and investment consultation for early stage companies, namely, nurturing start-up companies into viable functioning businesses in the marketplace and securing support from companies and other local, regional, national and international organizations to foster development for high technology businesses; venture capital investment funding services, namely, awarding grants and providing loans to start-up companiesACTIVEOct 1, 1997
042Technology incubator services for stimulating the development of high technology entrepreneurs; design and testing of new product development, namely testing the invention of others in technical fieldsACTIVEFeb 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance