USPTO serial 75821385
SWEETBEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEETBEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Powers, Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by Powers, Daniel
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SWEETBEAT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |