Drawing for BURGER-LOVER

USPTO serial 75821569

BURGER-LOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURGER-LOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Gryce, Esq.

DAVID C GRYCE ESQ ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029POULTRY AND/OR VEGETARIAN PATTIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 19, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance