USPTO serial 75821650
Serial No. 75821650
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75821650?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE, NAMELY CHAT ROOM AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGE POSTING APPLICATIONS THAT ALLOW USERS TO POST ELECTRONIC NOTES ON ELECTRONIC SITES, SUCH AS WEB SITES, ON A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK AND ON A LOCAL AREA COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1999 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A VIRTUAL INTERNET PLATFORM FOR USER-GENERATED CONTENT AND DISCUSSION; CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION AND WEB SITES AND RETRIEVING INFORMATION AND WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING A CONTENT RATING SYSTEM BASED UPON USER PREFERENCES; AND USER-INITIATED POLLING | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |