USPTO serial 75822597
CACHITA SPICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CACHITA SPICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PROCESSED HERBS AND SPICES, NAMELY, ANISE SEED, ANNATO PASTE, BAY LEAVES, CHAMOMILE FLOWERS, CINNAMON STICKS, CORIANDER SEED, CRUSHED RED PEPPER, CURRY POWDER, DION DION, EUCALYPTUS, FLAXSEED, GROUND ANNATO SEED, GROUND BAY LEAVES, GROUND BLACK PEPPER, GROUND CINNAMON, GROUND CUMIN, GROUND NUTMEG, GROUND OREGANO, GROUND WHITE PEPPER, LINDEN FLOWERS, MARJORAM, SESAME SEED, PAPRIKA, PARSLEY, PEPPERMINT, ROSEMARY, SAGE, STAR ANISE; WHOLE ALL SPICE, WHOLE ANNATO SEED, WHOLE BLACK PEPPER, WHOLE CLOVES, WHOLE CUMIN, WHOLE MEXICAN OREGANO, WHOLE NUTMEG, AND WHOLE OREGANO; CAKE DECORATIONS | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |