USPTO serial 75822678
WILD FLAVORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILD FLAVORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-69214 Eppelheim Heidelberg, DE
D-69214 Eppelheim Heidelberg, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Food flavorings, being essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food and beverage flavorings, not being essential oils, namely, flavors, aromas, essences and distillates | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of food and beverage flavoring to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development, consultation in the field of food and beverage flavoring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WILD FLAVORS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |