USPTO serial 75823870
HAGGLEWITHUS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAGGLEWITHUS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services; retail sales services provided by means of a global computer network; computerized searching, ordering and on-line retail and wholesale distributorship services featuring travel and travel-related services; providing access to on-line directories, indices and searchable databases relating to a variety of information and data available on a global computer network; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network; providing an on-line searchable database for the sale of travel and travel-related services of others; providing an on-line searchable ordering guide for locating, organizing and presenting goods and services of on-line vendors; database aggregation, integration and management services | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |