USPTO serial 75824197
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cornwall PL27 7QJ, GB
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | SURGICAL BANDAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY LIMB PROSTHESES; ORTHOMEDICAL SUPPORT ARTICLES, NAMELY, LUMBAR SUPPORTS BELTS WITH BRACES, LUMBAR SUPPORTS BELTS WITHOUT BRACES, ELASTICATED WRAP-AROUND BACK SUPPORT VESTS WITH BRACES, ELASTICATED WRAP-AROUND BACK SUPPORT VESTS WITHOUT BRACES, SUPPORT SLEEVES FOR THE CALF, THIGH, KNEE, ANKLE, ELBOW OR WRIST, SUPPORT WRAPS FOR THE CALF, THIGH, KNEE, ANKLE, ELBOW OR WRIST, RIGHT SHOULDER SUPPORTS, LEFT SHOULDER SUPPORTS AND BILATERAL SHOULDER SUPPORTS; ORTHOPEDIC BANDAGES, BELTS, SUPPORTS AND SPLINTS; SURGICAL SPLINTS; ORTHOPEDIC BELTS AND BRACES; LUMBAR SUPPORTS; HEATING CUSHIONS AND PADDING FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; ORTHOPEDIC FOOTWEAR AND INSOLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | CUSHIONS AND PATS FOR WHEELCHAIRS AND INVALID CARRIAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | SHEETS, BLANKETS AND COVERS FOR BEDS, WHEELCHAIRS AND INVALID CARRIAGES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |