CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THINKBOX

USPTO serial 75824720

THINKBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINKBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Godler

Alison Napack Kallman31 Penwood RoadBedford Corners, NY 10549UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, creating, designing and implementing websites for others; computer software design for others; consultation services in the fields of education and school curriculum programs; and design of toys for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 25, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance