USPTO serial 75824758
3D ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3D ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Instant holographic printing system, namely, computers, video cameras and still cameras; computer software for operating holographic printing apparatus, image printers and holographic films | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | photographic film developing, printing and computer imaging for three dimensional photographs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | printing services for three dimensional photographs; portrait photography, photographic composition for others, and photographic reporting for three dimensional photographs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Sony Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 3D ME
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |