USPTO serial 75827876
WINDLOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINDLOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 827, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | vinyl siding | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |