Drawing for HOB.COM THE HOME OF LIVE MUSIC ON THE INTERNET

USPTO serial 75828128

HOB.COM THE HOME OF LIVE MUSIC ON THE INTERNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOB.COM THE HOME OF LIVE MUSIC ON THE INTERNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellie Schwimmer

Ellie Schwimmer Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.9348 Civic Center DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, monthly magazines in the field of musical entertainment, calendars, postcards, stationary, posters, greeting cards, stickers, temporary tattoos, decals, bumper stickers, paper napkins, note cards, note pads and catalogs featuring pre-recorded music and wearing apparelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 4, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance