Drawing for XPERT XPERIENCES

USPTO serial 75828893

XPERT XPERIENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with XPERT XPERIENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL S GLUCK

DANIEL S GLUCK LONDA AND TRAUB LLP20 EXCHANGE PL 37TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016automotive books, booklets, printed guides and manuals; automotive industry new bulletins and newslettersACTIVE—
035preparing and providing on-line content in the automotive industry, namely, general and local news and news of interest to automobile purchasers or prospective purchasers and general and customized information on a wide variety of topicsACTIVE—
042computer consultation; leasing of computer facilities; computer programming for others; computer services, namely, creating, designing, implementing and maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; computer services, namely, providing databases featuring general and local news, and news of interest to automobile purchasers or prospective purchasers; computer services, namely, providing on-line manuals, guides, newsletters, news bulletins, and magazines, in the automotive field; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance