USPTO serial 75828974
POJO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POJO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hoffman Estates, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Hankin
MARC E HANKIN SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL601 S FIGUEROA STSTE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5704Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely magazines in the field of collectibles, trading cards, cartoons, and video games | ACTIVE | Oct 18, 1999 |
| 035 | Retail store services, available through computer communications and interactive television, featuring toys, books, videos and music; dissemination of advertising and promotional information for others via an online communications network | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1999 |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning collectibles, trading cards, cartoons, and video games | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 1999 |
| 041 | providing news, information, and entertainment services via global communications network in the field of collectible goods and cartoons | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |