USPTO serial 75828996
GIZMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIZMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Boshinski
THOMAS A BOSHINSKI WORLD HEADQUARTERSCOURTHOUSE PLZ NE 26TH FLDAYTON, OH 45463UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SCHOOL BINDER KIT, NAMELY A BINDER CARRYING NOTEBOOK PAPER, TAB DIVIDERS, A PAPER PUNCH, A DRAWING RULER, A PENCIL CASE AND PENCIL SHARPENER; STATIONERY TYPE PORTFOLIOS; DAILY, WEEKLY AND MONTHLY PLANNERS; ALL FOR SALE THROUGH MASS MERCHANDISE OUTLETS, SUPERMARKETS AND DRUGSTORES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |