USPTO serial 75829035
SILVER HILLS BAKERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2806829Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2004
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILVER HILLS BAKERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ABBOTSFORD, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
ABBOTSORD, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
ABBOTSFORD, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
Tanya M. Reitzel Coastal Trademark ServicesSuite 2200 - 555 West Hastings StreetBox 12109Vancouver, V6B 4N6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BREADS, BUNS, MUFFINS, COOKIES, PASTRY DOUGH AND BREAKFAST CEREALS; BAGELS ( Based on 44) PASTA; READY-TO-EAT CEREAL-DERIVED FOOD BARS, CRACKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIBRANT HEALTH PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIBRANT HEALTH PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIBRANT HEALTH PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SILVER HILLS BAKERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |