Drawing for BIDEXPERT.COM

USPTO serial 75829451

BIDEXPERT.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIDEXPERT.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B Lasky

MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP6500 CITY W PKWY STE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344-7701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ON-LINE AUCTION SERVICES; ON-LINE TRADING SERVICES IN WHICH SELLER POSTS ITEMS TO BE AUCTIONED AND BIDDING IS DONE ELECTRONICALLY, AND PROVIDING EVALUATIVE FEEDBACK AND RATINGS OF SELLER'S GOODS AND SERVICES, THE VALUE AND PRICES OF SELLERS' GOODS, BUYERS' AND SELLERS' PERFORMANCE, DELIVERY AND OVERALL TRADING EXPERIENCE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHER VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
036AUTOMATED AND COMPUTERIZED TRADING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INSURANCE, FINANCIAL AFFAIRS, MONETARY AFFAIRS, REAL ESTATE AFFAIRS AND COMMODITY TRADING SERVICES FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
038PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING ITEMS FOR AUCTION, VALUE AND PRICES OF ITEMS FOR AUCTION, SELLER FEEDBACK AND RATINGS, AND DELIVERY OF ITEMS OF AUCTIONACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance