USPTO serial 75829473
DIRECTQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRECTQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Communicator Asystance Systems, Inc.
Malden, MA
Other trademarks owned by Communicator Asystance Systems, Inc.
QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.
DENVER, CO
Other trademarks owned by QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Communicator Asystance Systems, Inc.
Malden, MA
Other trademarks owned by Communicator Asystance Systems, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M Mulholland
GRETCHEN L PROCHASKA TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for organizing and managing computer-based customer contact information and for placing and directing telephone calls from a host computer for use in telemarketing, call center management, contract management and customer support | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Communicator Asystance Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Communicator Asystance Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIRECTQUEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |