USPTO serial 75829569
RING OF FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RING OF FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas H. Elliott
DOUGLAS H ELLIOTT THOMASON MOSER & PATTERSON LLP3040 POST OAK BLVD STE 1500HOUSTON, TX 77056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | COOKING APPARATUS AND PARTS THEREOF SUITABLE FOR COOKING MEAT, NAMELY, COMMERCIAL AND DOMESTIC COOKING OVENS, BARBECUE PIT IN THE NATURE OF A BARBECUE GRILL; ELECTRIC ROTISSERIE OVENS; AND ROTISSERIE GRILLS | ACTIVE | Mar 6, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |