Drawing for DRYSPACE

USPTO serial 75830040

DRYSPACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRYSPACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Standley

JEFFREY S STANDLEY495 METRO PL S STE 210DUBLIN, OH 43017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019NON-METALLIC BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, DRAINGE SYSTEM FOR DECKS COMPRISED OF NON-METALLIC PANELS AND FASTENING CLIPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance