USPTO serial 75830205
CLAIMS MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2768329Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLAIMS MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank L. Kubler
Frank L. Kubler Oltman Flynn & Kubler915 Middle River Drive403 Galleria Professional BuildingFT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance claim management services, namely, services in the field of property, casualty, general liability and commercial automobile insurance claims for legal departments of insurance companies and third party claim administrators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1996 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing property, casualty, general liability and commercial automobile insurance claims for legal departments of insurance companies and of third party claim administrators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |