Drawing for BABY BRAHMS

USPTO serial 75830452

BABY BRAHMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY BRAHMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee B. Beitchman

MS MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0633UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio cassettes, video tapes, compact discs, and digital video discs containing music intended to develop and/or improve the creative and intellectual faculties of infants and children, in IC Class 009.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance