Drawing for SOL@

USPTO serial 75830716

SOL@

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOL@?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROLAND PLOTTEL

STEPHEN M KNAUER GEMPLUS3 LAGOON DR STE 300REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038COMMUNICATIONS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE AND DATA VIA LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS; ELECTRONIC STORED-AND-FORWARD MESSAGING SERVICES, DELIVERY OF MESSAGES VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES, DATA, AND IMAGES ASSISTED BY COMPUTERS; RENTAL OF MESSAGE TRANSMISSION APPARATUS; AND TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA BY TELEPHONEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance