Drawing for SEPARATE THE EXPERIENCE FROM THE DEVICE

USPTO serial 75830793

SEPARATE THE EXPERIENCE FROM THE DEVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOKOLS, GWEN P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEPARATE THE EXPERIENCE FROM THE DEVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Everett E. Fruehling

EVERETT E FRUEHLING VISOMARK LAW GROUP, PLLC1415 WESTERN AVE STE 501SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DYNAMIC SOFTWARE PLATFORM FOR CONNECTING, DIRECTING, TRANSFORMING, PROCESSING, MANAGING, AND DELIVERING DIGITAL INFORMATION AND CONTENT FLOWS TO COMPUTING DEVICES SUCH A S COMPUTERS, INTERNET APPLIANCES, AND INFORMATION APPLIANCES IN DISTRIBUTED NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS IN THE FIELDS OF MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT DELIVERY MANAGEMENT, IN ORDER TO ASSEMBLE AND INTEGRATE DISTRIBUTED HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE RESOURCES ON-THE-FLY TO CARRY OUT SPECIFIC NETWORKED COMPUTING TASKS OR CREATE GIVEN MULTIMEDIA CONTENT EXPERIENCES FOR USERS, AS WELL AS MANAGE NETWORK AND APPLIANCE NEEDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance